COW ELECTION 2014
LIVE CAM HWY 97 @ WESTSIDE RD
CHBC TV News
Joe Rich Community
Kelowna Daily Courier
Vernon Daily Courier
Bennett Bridge Cam
Interior Highway Cams
District of Central Okanagan
of Okanagan Similkameen
District of Peachland
City of Penticton
City of Vernon
District of West Kelowna
Kelowna's Best Rock
RDCO Board Calender
RDCO Meeting Schedule
RDCO Board Reports
RDCO Board Agenda
RDCO Board Minutes
Gov Service Agenda
Gov Service Minutes
RDCO GIS Map
Westside Rd. Maps
Westside Rd Interchange
Westside Rd COMPLAINT FORM
Jobs in Vernon
Jobs in Kelowna
Food Action Society
BCGov FOI form
BC Forest Fire Info
BC Wildfires of Note
Kelowna Yacht Club Wind Direction/Speed
okanaganlakebc.ca on Twitter
NEXT CANADIAN ELECTION
October 15, 2012 May 2, 2011
Canadian Parliament has been dissolved now by the Governor General
"A nation of sheep soon begets a government of wolves."
Edward R. Murrow
In 2007, Parliament passed a law fixing federal election dates every four years
and scheduling the next election date as October 19, 2009, but the law does not
(and constitutionally cannot) limit the powers of the Governor General to
dissolve Parliament at any time, such as when opposition parties bring down the
government on a vote of confidence. However, in this election there was no loss
of a non-confidence vote, but the Prime Minister asked the Governor General to
call an election nonetheless.
The 41st Canadian federal election is tentatively scheduled for October 15,
2012, under the Canada Elections Act, unless the 40th Canadian Parliament is
dissolved earlier by the Governor General. Voters will choose members of the
Canadian House of Commons for the 41st Canadian Parliament.
Letter: Politics rigged to support the party, not the
Kelowna Capital News - Oct 6, 2015
To the editor:
It's a perennial complaint and on-going dilemma: Why is
voter turnout so low and continues to fall? It's really
not rocket science though you might think so by the
matter in which all the politicians, bureaucrats,
intelligencia and the usual know-it-alls continuously
scratch their heads over the issue. The fact of the
matter is the system is broken and it has been broken
since Pierre Elliot Trudeau altered the Constitutionally
described manner in which bills would be voted on in the
house in order to give more power to the Prime
Minister's Office (PMO).
As per the Canadian Constitution, when a bill is
presented for a vote, all MPs are allowed to vote on the
bill according to their conscious. If it is a governing
party presented bill and is defeated, then a vote of
confidence or non-confidence is held.
If the MPs of the governing party want to keep their job
they vote 'confidence' in the governing party.
However, sometime during his eight-year reign, between
1976 and 1984, our darling Prime Minister Pierre Elliot
Trudeau, in a manner that is all too common in our
present governing practises—behind closed doors in a
secret meeting—made a slight adjustment and alteration
to the manner in which bills would be voted on; that
being the vote for the bill also became the vote of
confidence or non-confidence.
Hence, if the MPs wanted to keep their job they had to
vote for the bill regardless of how they felt about it.
So you see—no matter how good or bad the candidate is
that is supposedly representing your riding, you are, in
truth and reality, only voting for the party leader who
tells them how they are going to vote (because if the
don't do as they told they get the boot). All power and
authority is in the realm of the PMO—look around and
what do you see??
Now, really, when people, particularly the young, though
they don't even know how things are really suppose to be
conducted, understand and know that something is amiss
and wrong, can you actually blame them for having no
trust, faith or belief in the system? The Canadian
Constitution, if adhered to, is really a marvellous
document; however, in their craving for power and
control those in positions of authority, claiming they
know better twist things to suit their own individual
needs and desires.
Just to let you know, I am probably one of the very few
Canadians who has ever actually bothered to read any
portion of our Constitution—have you? The section on
taxation was my particular area of interest and yah, it
is a pretty boring read.
John B. Collinson, Kelowna
Why celebrate the constitution?
Castanet.net Letters - Apr 20, 2012 - Story# 74125
To the editor:
The Prime Minister’s lack of enthusiasm for the 30th anniversary of
repatriating the Constitution is quite understandable.
There is nothing to celebrate.
On April 17 1982 only two things happened:
1. The Canadian government became the administrator of the British
North America Act (BNA), and by virtue of an Act of Parliament,
re-named it The Constitution Act of Canada.
2. The government also adopted and included in the Act a section
referred to as The Canadian Charter of Rights.
The people of Canada were never allowed a binding national
referendum to decide if they wanted to accept the BNA as their
Constitution as is, or if they wanted to write their own.
In other words, the government essentially hi-jacked the
Constitution, and we still have Colonial style governments. To make
matters worse, our politicians have since turned their backs on the
Constitution while the Courts have become busy re-writing it.
In democratic societies the Constitution and the laws of the Land
are written by the People and enforced by the Courts. Until such
time we become a democratic society where the Constitution belongs
to the People - all I can muster is a whoopee ding.
Okanagan-Shuswap electoral boundary examined
Vernon Morning Star - April 13, 2012
Canada’s federal electoral map is changing.
Every 10 years, after the census is conducted, the number of
electoral districts and their boundaries are revised to reflect
population shifts and growth.
That includes looking at B.C. and the Okanagan-Shuswap electoral
The Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for B.C. has been
established and it has begun its review of the province’s federal
The three-person commission is headed by John E. Hall while the
commissioners are Stewart Ladyman and Peter Meekison.
“I shall seek to ensure that designated new electoral boundaries and
districts in this province will be fair to voters in terms of
representational equality and regional representation and reflect
historic patterns of representation,” said Hall.
B.C.’s population has increased from 3,907,738 in 2001 to 4,400,057
in 2011, and the commission is currently formulating a proposal for
B.C.’’s 42 seats in the House of Commons to reflect population
The B.C. commission will publish its proposal outlining the new
electoral map in a few months, and public hearings will follow.
In order to involve the public as soon as possible in the process,
the commission is inviting citizens to participate in creating the
initial proposal by providing their comments by e-mail or mail by
To learn more about redistribution of federal electoral districts,
|News 1130 - News Alert by email
November 8, 2011
Canada's balanced budget delayed
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says the federal budget deficit will
not be eliminated until 2015-16, one year later than planned. He is
also cutting half of the planned payroll tax increases for
Unemployment Insurance premiums.
Click photo below to see who that is ROFLOL!
STEPHEN HARPER WON AGAIN in 2011? WHY?
This graphic is free to use on your own website or where ever, so please take it and use it.
Dan Bouchard Green Party
David Finnis New
John Kidder Liberal
Party of Canada
Dan Albas Conservative
Party of Canada
cbc.ca - Comment by DaleMalone 2011/04/16
I'm anxious to see what scandal Monday will bring from the conservative
camp... They certainly don't disappoint... It's almost better than reading the
What Did I Miss?
A summary of the worst offences by Stephen Harper's conservative
government over the last few years.
Harper government failed to spend $50 M G8 fund 'transparently': A-G
By Mark Kennedy and Amy Minsky, Postmedia News -
April 11, 2011
Auditor General Sheila Fraser is expected to comment publicly Monday
about what she will do in the wake of a leaked report that has
landed like a bombshell in the federal election campaign.
Photograph by: Ashley Fraser, Postmedia News
OTTAWA — The Harper government did not act "clearly" and
"transparently" when it sought permission from Parliament to spend
$50 million on a G8 fund that delivered projects last year in a
Conservative riding, according to a draft report by the auditor
Furthermore, according to the document obtained Monday by Postmedia
News, the Conservative government failed to adequately keep records
to explain how the 32 projects were chosen for Parry Sound-Muskoka,
the southern Ontario riding represented by Tony Clement, the
The federal campaign was hit with a bombshell Monday morning in
media reports that said Fraser concluded in a draft audit prepared
in mid-January that the government had misinformed MPs and perhaps
had even broken the law through the way it sought funds in late
Senior Conservatives responded by saying that initial audit was not
valid because it was overtaken by another draft written the
following month by the auditor general's office which wasn't as
That second report — obtained by Postmedia News and dated Feb. 1 —
does not flatly state that the Tories misinformed Parliament. But it
is critical of the Conservative government — which first came to
office in 2006, promising greater transparency — for failing to be
adequately transparent in this instance.
The draft report recommends that the government review its practices
"so that when Parliament approves funds, it is presented with clear
and accurate information about how the funds will be used."
Fraser came under pressure Monday from all parties to release her
final report — which was supposed to be introduced in the House
April 5 but was postponed once Parliament was dissolved in late
But Fraser declared she will wait until after the May 2 election
before she releases the audit in Parliament. And in direct response
to the leak of the mid-January draft audit which ignited controversy
on the campaign trail, she urged Canadians to wait for her final
report to read its findings and conclusions.
Still, it is clear that the findings in the Feb. 1 audit — though
perhaps less harsh in tone — represent a distinct criticism of the
Indeed, the controversy threatens to throw Conservative leader
Stephen Harper off stride just as he enters this week's televised
In her report, Fraser draws attention to how the government decided
in February of 2009 to spend $50 million in the Parry Sound-Muskoka
region, which was scheduled to host the G8 summit in June 2010.
The government decided to establish a "G8 Legacy Infrastructure
Fund," with the money to be used to help the region prepare for the
summit and also to "enhance local infrastructure, and showcase the
natural beauty of the area for foreign dignitaries and media."
Opposition critics have always regarded the expenditures as a "slush
fund" to improve the Conservatives' popularity and to help re-elect
Clement. In the wake of the new leaks, they have renewed their
attack, calling for a public inquiry and accusing the Conservatives
of misleading Parliament.
In her Feb. 1 draft report, Fraser notes: "Parliament's approval is
needed before funding can be provided and moneys spent. When
Parliament is asked to approve such funding, it should be provided
with clear information on the nature of the request."
However, when the government sought parliamentary approval in
November of 2009 through the supplementary estimates, it folded the
$50 million into a larger, $83-million category which was described
as a Border Infrastructure Fund.
The supplementary estimates said the money was to be used for
"investment in infrastructure to reduce border congestion" — with no
mention made of how much of the money was actually going to
Parry-Sound-Muskoka, which is nowhere near the border. Parliament
approved the funding request in December 2009.
"In our view, the manner in which the G8 Legacy Infrastructure Fund
was presented did not make clear to Parliament the full nature of
the request," Fraser concluded.
"This categorization did not clearly or transparently identify the
nature of the approval being sought for G8 infrastructure project
expenditures or explain that these expenditures would not have to
meet the existing terms and conditions for the Border Infrastructure
The draft audit also contains a section on how the projects — which
ranged from a gazebo, to public washrooms, to sidewalk upgrades many
kilometres from the summit site — were selected.
It notes that a group consisting of three people — Clement, the
mayor of Huntsville, Ont., and the general manager of the Deerhurst
Resort that hosted the summit — was created as part of the project
selection process. Its job was to liaise with a summit management
office in the Foreign Affairs Department.
"We asked the summit management office to provide us with any
documentation showing how it was involved in the review and/or
selection of projects. We were informed that it had not been
involved in the review or selection of projects, but it had briefed
local communities on the G8 summit."
Of 242 project proposals submitted for the legacy fund, 33 were put
forward by Clement to the infrastructure department "for
consideration," according to the audit.
Thirty-two projects were subsequently approved and funded, and one
was withdrawn by a municipality.
The audit says that "due to the lack of supporting documentation,"
the auditors could not determine how the winning projects were
Huntsville Mayor Claude Doughty denied reports Monday that he had
any power over which infrastructure projects received the go-ahead
during last summer's G8 Summit.
Still, the auditors say they are "concerned" by the lack of records.
"Supporting document is important, in our view, to show that the
selection process was transparent and provided a mechanism for
The election campaign was dominated Monday by discussion of the
issue, as opposition parties pounced on reports about the first
audit, conducted in January, and demanded that the final report by
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff accused Harper of sitting on the
report, and called for its immediate release.
"These are shocking revelations," Ignatieff said. "I don't know how
Canadians can have confidence in a government that treats public
money in this way."
Ignatieff said Harper had "no choice" but to have the report
"He's got to explain to Canadians how he could have so scandalously
abused public money and so scandalously misled Parliament, and so
scandalously disobeyed the law."
NDP leader Jack Layton and Bloc Quebecois leader Gilles Duceppe
concurred, and called for the release of the report by Fraser and
the Speaker of the House of Commons — even though Parliament isn't
Even the Conservatives called on Fraser to publicly release the
final version of her report because they said Canadians should base
their views on the final report — and not just media coverage of the
January draft report.
Conservative candidate John Baird said that some of the inflammatory
parts in the draft report from January were not included in later
versions of the report.
"The phrase, 'Parliament was misinformed' is not contained in the
next draft of the report," he said, noting he saw a draft of the
Nina Chiarelli, acting director of communications to the prime
minister, said that "media speculation" on the contents of the
January report "does not reflect the final version of the report.
"Not only is the material misleading, it includes information that
the auditor general removed from more recent drafts of the report."
mkennedy "at" postmedia.com
aminsky "at" postmedia.com
© Copyright (c) Postmedia News
|Green Party not allowed in televised debates
News 1130 Breaking News Email Alert
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May will not be allowed to take part in
the televised leaders' debate. A Federal Court judge has decided not
to expedite the case before next week's debates
Support Elizabeth May and the
and sign the petition against bullying
|Should Elizabeth May be allowed to participate in the federal
Total votes: 1310
EDITORIAL: Debate decision an injustice
Vernon Morning Star - April 01, 2011
Picture this: a Canadian citizen wants to have his/her say by
voting. But the powers that be decide that since the individual
hasn’t participated in the democratic process before, their vote
will not be counted.
Seems unfair, doesn’t it?
Regardless of race, creed, colour or any personal opinion, everyone
has the right to a fair and democratic process.
While the above scenario is obviously for demonstration only, it
mirrors the bullying-type antics that are going on in the upcoming
Green Party candidate Elizabeth May has been denied a voice in the
televised leaders’ debate May 2.
The national broadcasters have stated May isn’t eligible to
participate because her party doesn’t have a seat in Parliament.
Seems like a very undemocratic decision.
As a news provider, we know that fairness is key to getting the
whole story out. Election coverage is no different. If there are
five candidates running in an election, every one of them deserves a
voice. You can’t just cover three or four of them and ignore the
There have been cases locally where upwards of 30 candidates have
run in municipal elections. And we’ve ensured that every single one
of them was given the chance to state their platform in the local
newspaper. Sure it’s a lot of extra work and space tied up, but it
would be irresponsible to do otherwise.
Thousands, if not millions, tune into the televised debate to get a
sense of what each leadership candidate has to offer.
Kicking May to the sidelines would be a disservice to democracy.
---Vernon Morning Star
Who gets your vote May 2?
Castanet.net - by Castanet Staff - Story: 61040 -
Mar 25, 2011
Canadians will be heading to the polls in early May after Stephen
Harper's Conservative government fell in an historic vote of
In a 156-145 vote, a majority of MP's believed the government was in
contempt of Parliament.
It's the first time in Canadian history a government had been found
in contempt of Parliament and only the fifth time a government has
fallen in a vote of non-confidence.
The last government to fall in a vote of non-confidence was Paul
Martin's Liberal government in 2005.
In a brief statement outside the House of Commons following the
vote, Harper indicated he would meet with the Governor General
Saturday and ask that Parliament be dissolved, triggering a spring
"There's nothing — nothing — in the budget that the opposition could
not or should not have supported. Unfortunately Mr. Ignatieff and
his coalition partners, the NDP and the Bloc, had already decided
they wanted to force an election instead," says Harper.
"The fourth election in seven years. An election Canadians clearly
The opposition leaders were clearly already in full blown election
"We've seen an historic moment in our democracy ... a prime minister
condemned by the chamber for contempt. He's lost the confidence of
the House of Commons," Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff told
"Over 36 days we'll present an appeal to Canadians who don't just
want to restrain him but replace him."
Meantime, NDP leader Jack Layton portrayed his party as the only
alternative to the Conservatives.
"New Democrats will be all across the country taking on the
Conservatives, and we'll show that we're the only party capable of
defeating the Conservatives coast to coast to coast ," says Layton.
|There were two polls on Castanet.net. The one poll (bottom) had
been closed and the other (top) had not been closed when we seen
them. These were the results when we looked.
Who will you
vote for in the upcoming Federal Election?
Will not vote 151
Total Votes 1481
This poll had not been closed yet when we seen these numbers so
these numbers could have changed later on.
Should the Conservative government tweak the budget to avoid a
Total Votes 2310
This poll had already been closed when we seen these totals, so
these numbers were the end result.
The news said that this May 2, 2011 election will cost $292
Election day set for May 2, 2011
CBC News Posted: Mar 26, 2011
leaders begin campaigns after writ drops
Canada's 41st federal election campaign began Saturday morning
after Prime Minister Stephen Harper emerged from a meeting with the
Governor General, who agreed to dissolve Parliament and send
Canadians to the polls on May 2.
Referring to the "disappointing" events of a day earlier, when his
government was defeated by a motion of non-confidence, Harper
thanked Canadians "for the confidence and trust" they have given him
for the last five years.
"It has been a privilege and an honour to serve as prime minister,
especially prime minister of the best country in the world, as
together we have faced the most difficult days of the global
economic recession," he said.
He went on to say that the global economic recovery remains fragile
and that armed conflicts, political chaos, humanitarian disasters
and other threats are posing risks to that recovery, and now, so is
The opposition parties are forcing an election that Canadians don't
want and the economy doesn't need, said Harper, in his remarks
outside the front doors of Rideau Hall.
The campaign now underway is blocking the Conservatives from
implementing the economic plan presented in its budget on March 22,
that was immediately rejected by all three opposition parties.
"To my fellow Canadians I say this: the opposition parties have made
their choice. Now we Canadians get to make ours," he said,
announcing that May 2 will be election day.
Voters will pick between "a stable, national government" that will
keep taxes low and create jobs, and, "a reckless coalition," that
will kill jobs, halt the economic recovery and put families back.
Ahead of Harper's appearance, Ignatieff released a statement
insisting he won't try to form a coalition with any other party. But
the Liberal leader defended coalitions as a "legitimate
constitutional option" in Canada's parliamentary system.
Despite Ignatieff's statement, Harper was adamant his Liberal rival
would try to form a coalition government with the NDP and Bloc
Québécois. The only thing those parties would be able to agree on is
spending more money and raising taxes, said Harper, who repeatedly
pushed the economy and the coalition messages throughout his remarks
and responses to questions from reporters.
Asked how he interpreted the vote of non-confidence that brought his
government down Friday, Harper said Canadians don't care about the
wording of motions and political manoeuvres, they care about their
economic well-being and the standing of Canada in the world.
"That's what that vote was about and that's what this election is
going to be about," said Harper.
The Conservative leader, who represents a Calgary riding, is kicking
off his campaign Saturday afternoon in Quebec City.
Soon after the writ was dropped, Ignatieff spoke to reporters on
Parliament Hill and later in the day will hold a rally in downtown
Ottawa. He will later travel to Montreal, where Bloc Québécois
Leader Gilles Duceppe is spending Saturday. Meanwhile, NDP Leader
Jack Layton kicked off his campaign with a rally at a hotel steps
away from Parliament Hill and a few hours later was heading for
Campaign 'a moment of contrast': Ignatieff
Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff stands with candidates as he
launches his campaign in front of Centre Block on Parliament Hill in
Ottawa on Saturday. Ryan Remiorz/Canadian Press It's starting to
become clear just what script each party will follow. The
Conservatives are hitting hard on the election being unnecessary and
irresponsible, and can build a campaign around the hold-steady style
of budget they presented earlier this week. They are painting the
opposition parties as a threat to the economy and arguing a
coalition is inevitable if voters don't choose the Conservatives.
The opposition parties say the issue is one of ethics and respect
for democracy, which they say are lacking in the Conservative Party.
Speaking on Saturday outside Parliament, Ignatieff called the coming
campaign "a moment of contrast" between the Harper government, which
he said has shown "contempt for the fundamentals of democracy," and
the Liberal alternative.
"We will be offering Canadians a government of the people, a
government devoted to the people," he said, flanked by a group of
The Liberals are expected to focus on recent scandals hitting the
Conservatives, including charges of electoral fraud for two
senators, allegations staff interfered with access to information
requests and an accusation a former senior advisor to the prime
minister tried to use his influence to promote his girlfriend's
Struggling families 'left behind': Layton
NDP Leader Jack Layton at his campaign launch in Ottawa on March 26,
2011. The NDP, meanwhile, say they're the real alternative to the
Conservatives because in many ridings their candidates run second to
the Tories who won seats.
NDP leader Jack Layton asked Canadians to help him defeat Harper's
Conservatives and elect him prime minister instead on May 2.
In delivering his first speech of the campaign, Layton vowed to
bring "Canadian leadership" to the job and to fix what he says is
broken in Ottawa.
"I'm asking for a mandate to lead the next government," Layton said
with a boisterous crowd surrounding him at a downtown Ottawa hotel.
Layton laid out the broad strokes of his campaign, saying the NDP
will present concrete proposals to help the struggling families that
Harper has "left behind." His party will introduce "affordable"
measures to improve the country's pension system, put forward a plan
to ensure families have access to child care and education, and will
improve health care.
Layton said if a minority government is elected on May 2, he can be
counted on to reach out to the other parties and work with them
either on a case-by-case basis, or, in "more stable arrangements."
"I will work with the mandate you give me," Layton said.
The Bloc say they're the only party who can defend Quebec's
The opposition Liberals, NDP and Bloc Québécois came together Friday
afternoon in a historic vote to say they no longer have confidence
in the Conservative government.
The motion says the House agrees with a committee report tabled
earlier this week that found the government in contempt of
Parliament, "which is unprecedented in Canadian parliamentary
history, and consequently the House has lost confidence in the
Earlier this week, the procedure and House affairs committee tabled
a report that said the government is in contempt of parliament for
refusing to supply enough information on the cost of the F-35
fighter jets, their justice system reforms and their projections for
corporate profits and tax rates.
Okanagan-Shuswap candidates on the campaign trail
Vernon Morning Star - By Richard Rolke - March 25,
The long wait is over for Canadians.
The minority Conservative government fell today after the opposition
pushed through a non-confidence motion over allegations of contempt
It’s believed Prime Minister Stephen Harper will ask Gov.-Gen. David
Johnston Saturday to dissolve Parliament, paving the way for an
election May 2 or 9.
“We are ready,” said Colin Mayes, Okanagan-Shuswap Conservative MP,
of launching a campaign.
“I have a good support group that’s already been active.”
Mayes, who lives in Salmon Arm, will try and win his third term as
New on the ballot will be Nicki Inouye, a Vernonite who is
representing the NDP.
“We have everything in gear. I’m just waiting for my brochures,” she
“I need to get my name out there and I’ve been present at a few
community events already.”
This will also be the first election campaign for Coldstream
resident Greig Crockett of the Green Party.
“We have people getting ready,” he said of his campaign.
“I’ve only been in the position for two weeks so there’s a bit of a
panic. But we have momentum.”
A familiar name on the ballot will be Liberal candidate Janna
She also represented the party in the 2008 election.
“We have print material ready to go and a team of volunteers in
place,” she said of the upcoming campaign.
In the 2008 election, the Conservatives received 51.72 per cent of
the vote in Okanagan-Shuswap, while the NDP garnered 19.70 per cent,
17.30 per cent went to the Green Party and 10 per cent to the
Liberals. There were also two other candidates on the ballot.
A less proud country
The Ottawa Citizen - By Lawrence Scanlan, Citizen
Special July 28, 2010
Apathetic Canadians have allowed
their government to trample freedoms -- but opposition is mounting
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his government have shown an
instinct for control at the expense of democratic values, writes
Photograph by: Chris Wattie, Reuters, Citizen Special
There's been a sea change, a darkening of the political climate
in this country. The first instinct is to discount such troubling
thoughts. So perhaps the view of someone born elsewhere, but long on
our shores, is more to be trusted.
Ursula Franklin -- the celebrated physicist, pacifist, author and
Companion of the Order of Canada -- recently spoke to CBC Radio's
The Current. She had survived a Nazi death camp and come to Canada
hoping for better. Now 88, Franklin is "profoundly worried about the
absence and erosion of democracy in Canada."
Democracy, I heard her say on the radio, is a slow and messy
process. When Franklin sees cabinet ministers holding press
conferences to discuss legislation not yet debated in the House of
Commons, she sees that process being skirted. And when she hears the
prime minister saying he does not "trust" the Opposition, she sees
contempt for democracy itself. "Who wants to live in a country,"
Franklin asked, "where those who don't think like you are deemed
A German reporter here to cover the G20 summit likened Toronto's
walls to the Berlin Wall and Checkpoint Charlie. I was just in
Berlin and the checkpoint these days comprises a few sandbags and
two "soldiers" in Second World War American uniforms posing for
tourists' cameras. Walls fall in one place, rise up in another. But
surely not here?
The annual gathering of the Writers' Union of Canada took place in
Ottawa in June, with many former chairs on hand to offer memories of
their time in office. Susan Crean remembered encountering a young,
blue-eyed politico at a constitutional conference in Calgary in
1992. When the man learned that she had co-authored a certain book
about American domination of Canadian and Quebec politicians, the
man responded: "You should not have been allowed to write that
The man: Stephen Harper. Crean never forgot his words, but
especially the word allowed. The room full of writers in Ottawa
issued a gasp.
Crean later elaborated on the encounter. "Harper spoke to me first
and asked if I had written 'that book.' I asked which one, and he
mentioned Two Nations, which I wrote with Quebec
activist/sociologist and well known independentiste Marcel Rioux.
... Harper was clearly still angry about having had to read it at
university. In his view, I took it, the book was treasonous. I was
so shaken by his words, and his open hostility, that I immediately
left the dining room."
No PM should be held strictly accountable for every utterance before
taking office. But this exchange suggests an instinct to control and
suppress, and that is precisely -- 18 years on -- what the Harper
government is being accused of.
An on-line petition, called Voices-Voix, is now circulating. Some
1,500 individuals have signed it (including Margaret Atwood), along
with more than 150 organizations -- from Amnesty International to
Democracy Watch to the Quakers. The petition begins: "Since 2006 the
Government of Canada has systematically undermined democratic
institutions and practices, and has eroded the protection of free
speech, and other fundamental human rights. It has deliberately set
out to silence the voices of organizations or individuals who raise
concerns about government policies or disagree with government
positions. ... Organizations that disagree with the Government's
positions and/or engage in advocacy have had their mandates
criticized and their funding threatened, reduced or discontinued."
Case in point is KAIROS, a social justice organization that lost its
funding after decades of CIDA support. Immigration minister Jason
Kenney stunned KAIROS last December by calling it anti-Semitic. More
finger-pointing from a government that argues, for example, that
anyone not backing Canada's military involvement in Afghanistan is
unpatriotic. This is discourse for licence plates, not Parliament.
The Writers' Union spoke out last fall when a B.C. author who had
written a book critical of the Olympics was harassed by security
officials, and when liberal American authors were detained at the
Canadian border. Is there a pattern here?
The G20 summit, with its state police flavour, mass arrests and
trampling of basic civil rights, made a kind of sense -- for ours is
a government obsessed with order. But the summit was so excessive,
so ... unCanadian. The quiet pride that once had Canadian travellers
stitching our flag on their backpacks has vanished.
Ursula Franklin defines peace as the presence of justice and the
absence of fear. Which is ascendant in our home and native land --
justice, or fear? Canada Day chest-beating and fireworks failed to
counter other evidence that this country has morphed so radically
that one has to wonder if Lester B. Pearson would, today, even
recognize the place. The tar sands, our pathetic stance at the
Copenhagen conference on climate change, the prison farms/super
prisons debacle, ongoing asbestos mining, the shift from peacekeeper
to major player in a dubious war, Afghan detainees: what's
appalling, and indeed what has perhaps enabled all this, is our
apathy. And there's a price to be paid for apathy.
A few months ago, Ned Franks, a retired political science professor
and constitutional expert, spoke in the wake of the proroguing of
Parliament (yet again). He gave compelling statistical evidence that
the rapid turnover of MPs and senior ministry staff in recent years
has left Parliament weak and dysfunctional. Parliament sits less
now, and when things don't go the way the PM likes it, he just shuts
it down. A power vacuum has been created, and the PMO is rapidly
"We should call him King Stephen the First of Canada," says Franks,
"for that, in effect, is the way he is behaving."
I spent six years researching a book on philanthropy, and I became
convinced tax dollars, wisely deployed, can help diminish the gap
between rich and poor -- as is done in Scandinavian countries. Our
government freely spends tax dollars on prisons, police and war
machinery, while insisting "taxes" is a dirty word. After the G8
summit in Italy in July 2009, Harper opined, "I don't believe that
any taxes are good taxes." Globe and Mail columnist Jeffrey Simpson
rightly called it "one of the most stunning, revealing and, frankly,
ignorant statements ever made by a prime minister ... very, very
scary socially and politically."
I interviewed many NGO staffers for my book, and I was struck by how
carefully they feel they must tread.
Ursula Franklin likens democracy to a potluck supper in which
everyone brings something, even if only a willingness to wash
dishes. The Canadian government is offering a closed-door dinner,
and only to those who share the ideology of the host.
Lawrence Scanlan is the author of A Year of Living Generously:
Dispatches from the Front Lines of Philanthropy. It was published by
Douglas & McIntyre in May.
© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen
P.M. giving away Canadian sovereignty
Kelowna Capital News - July 29, 2010
To the editor:
Please tell me where is the news that should supersede anything and
I mean anything in Canada right now?
Our Prime Minister, with a mere 37.65 per cent of the people who
voted behind him, is fully intending to give away Canadian
sovereignty in favour of a few trade deals and a few dollars.
He has finally come right out and said what a lot of us have been
thinking he has wanted since he became prime minister.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper: “I know some people don’t like it. It
is a loss of national sovereignty, but it is a simple reality.” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McWAnMWoSyY)
This is our prime minister who refused to
acknowledge in the election of 2008 that there was a financial
problem in Canada, to one whom now, less than two years later, says
we have to surrender our sovereignty to survive financially.
This is treason from a man who does not have the backing of the
majority of Canadians, who has not asked Canadians for this mandate,
who has not conferred with Parliament, who is simply taking the
country where he wants the country to go—into the world government
Did you (editors) even know this? If you did, why have you hidden it
from Canadians—your readers or watchers or listeners—who rely on you
for this kind of information?
I acknowledge that I do not read all your publications, and some of
you may have mentioned this development, and if you have, great. But
why is it still hidden news? Why have the rest of you not picked up
on it and simply shouted or rather screamed this to Canadians?
Your prime minister is willing and wants to give away Canada and
Do you not care? I do.
Wikipedia edits traced to Defence computers
The Vancouver Sun - By David Pugliese, Postmedia
News July 28, 2010
This undated handout image, courtesy
of the Joint Strike Fighter program site, shows the F-35
JSF.Photograph by: AFP, AFP
Defence Department computers in Ottawa have been used to vandalize
information on a Wikipedia site critical of the Conservative
government's decision to spend billions on a new stealth fighter.
(click link above for photo)
Nine attempts have been made to alter the online encyclopedia's
entry on the Joint Strike Fighter, including the removal of any
information critical of the Harper government's plan to spend at
least $16 billion on the new fighter aircraft.
Defence Department computers were also used to insert insults, aimed
at Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff, into the Wikipedia Joint Strike
Fighter page. Ignatieff has questioned the proposed purchase.
Quotes from news articles outlining opposition to the arms sale by
University of British Columbia professor Michael Byers, a former NDP
candidate, were also removed.
Wikipedia traced the alterations to three computers owned by Defence
Research and Development Canada's Ottawa offices. The online site
has labelled the July 20-21 alterations as vandalism.
The attempts to change the web page, made during work hours, stopped
when Wikipedia administrators locked down the entry on the Joint
Strike Fighter or JSF. That allowed only recognized editors to work
on the page. That particular Wikipedia site is popular, with more
than 78,000 page views in the first three weeks of July.
The Conservative government's decision in mid-July to spend an
estimated $16 billion on the Joint Strike Fighter has sparked
controversy, with opposition parties questioning whether the
purchase is needed at a time when the country's deficit has
ballooned to $50 billion.
A spokesman for Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) said
the attempts to alter the Wikipedia page were not part of a
concerted effort to stifle debate on the proposed JSF purchase but
inappropriate use of government computers by, as yet, an
unidentified individual or individuals.
"It sounds to me like someone was freelancing," said Martin Champoux,
DRDC's manager of public affairs. "This is not behaviour we commonly
He noted the government authorizes some personal use by employees on
work computers but that it has to be limited and reasonable. In
addition, federal employees are required by the public service code
of ethics to be non-partisan.
Champoux said information technology specialists are attempting to
track down those users associated with the Internet Protocol (IP)
addresses used to access the Wikipedia site.
He noted that while the IP addresses of the computers are registered
to DRDC Ottawa, the addresses also include other Defence Department
Champoux said reminders will be sent to employees about government
regulations regarding personal computer use.
The proposed purchase of the JSF, the most expensive military
equipment procurement in Canadian history, is supported by Canadian
air force officers. But Ignatieff, concerned that no competition was
held to select the fighter plane, has vowed to review the deal if
his party forms the next government.
The NDP and Bloc Quebecois have also spoken out about the planned
Canada won't be required to sign a contract committing it to
purchasing the stealth fighters until 2013, according to aerospace
industry representatives. That has opened the door for any future
government to back away from the proposed deal if needed.
Byers, who recently wrote a Toronto Star commentary criticizing the
JSF purchase, said the Harper government is particularly sensitive
about any opposition towards the JSF purchase, a situation reflected
by the attempts to alter the Wikipedia page.
"It indicates to me they are concerned about the fact the
announcement has been contested," he said. "I think that sensitivity
reflects the realization on their part that they stand on weak
ground, particularly on the lack of a competitive process."
Earlier this week, Conservative senator Pamela Wallin sent letters
to the National Post and the Toronto Star, complaining that in his
commentary, Byers was not identified as a member of the board of the
Ottawa-based Rideau Institute.
Wallin, chairwoman of the senate's defence committee, described the
institute as a left-wing peace and social policy think-tank that
criticizes military spending and seems to favour peacekeeping.
But Byers called Wallin's stance hypocritical, noting that in her
letters to newspapers she did not reveal that she is an honorary
Canadian air force colonel, as well as being on the board of
directors of the Conference of Defence Associations Institute, a
pro-military organization closely aligned with DND.
The Harper government wants to purchase 65 JSF.
But opposition members of Parliament point out that the military
just months ago received the last of the modernized CF-18 fighters
which can keep flying until at least 2017 or 2020. They question why
the Harper government is rushing now to spend billions on new
Datadotgc.ca encourages Canadian government to create open data
Straight.com - By Stephen Hui - July 27, 2010
Looking for government data in Canada and having trouble finding it?
While Americans have Data.gov and the British have Data.gov.uk,
Canadians don’t yet have an official portal offering easy access to
data generated by their federal government.
A group of open-data advocates isn’t waiting for Stephen Harper’s
Conservative government to jump on the bandwagon.
Datadotgc.ca, in hopes of showing the powers that be how it
“could and should” be done.
Launched in April by David Eaves and other volunteers, the Web site
offers links to and information about hundreds of data packages
published on-line by various federal departments and provincial
The site invites the public to add more open data and information to
What qualifies as open data? According to Datadotgc.ca, it’s data
that is “freely available to everyone, without restrictions from
copyright, patents or other mechanisms of control”.
Eaves, a public-policy consultant who sits on the executive of
Vision Vancouver, helped draft the motion that resulted in the City
of Vancouver endorsing a year ago the principles of open data, open
standards, and open-source software.
In September, Vancouver launched its open-data catalogue, making
data about community centres, drinking fountains, and more available
on the Web.
This is not an official Government of Canada website. Rather,
it’s a collaborative effort by a group of citizens who want our
governments to open their data — in useful, structured formats — so
we’re showing them how it could be done.
spend $9B on F-35 fighter jets
CBC News - Friday, July 16, 2010
Ignatieff wants House committee to examine 'secretive, unaccountable
Defence Minister Peter MacKay says the new fighter jets are 'the
best that we can provide our men and women in uniform.' (CBC)The
Canadian government said Friday it plans to spend $9 billion to
purchase a new generation of fighter jets, the F-35 Lightning II
Joint Strike Fighter.
Defence Minister Peter MacKay told a news conference in Ottawa that
the jets would be purchased from Lockheed Martin, with the first one
expected for delivery by 2016
The contract, one of the biggest military equipment purchases in
Canadian history, is worth $9 billion, but the full cost could rise
to as much $18 billion once the government signs a maintenance
'When you think purely about response times, there is nothing else
that can get across the country as fast as a fighter jet.'
—Mercedes Stephenson, military analyst MacKay said the government
would make further announcements on additional costs at a later
The new jets would replace an aging fleet of CF-18s that recently
underwent a $2.6-billion upgrade.
"This aircraft is the best that we can provide our men and women in
uniform, and this government is committed to giving them the very
best," MacKay said at a news conference.
Sole-source contract questioned
But the government is fending off criticism that it is making one of
the biggest military purchases in Canadian history without a single
The Liberals say the massive purchase of 65 jets should have been
subjected to competitive bids.
Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff is calling on the House of Commons
defence committee to reconvene as soon as possible to examine what
he calls the Tory government's "secretive, unaccountable decision to
proceed with this contract."
The Liberals want the committee to question other potential bidders
and procurement experts to determine whether a sole-sourced contract
gives maximum value to the government and taxpayers.
The F-35 Lightning II fighter jets set for purchase by the federal
government are made by Lockheed Martin. The Liberals, however, say
the purchase should have been subjected to competitive bids.
(Defence Department/Canadian Press)
"I think Canadians are amazed that the largest procurement deal in
the history of the country is a single-sourced — so, it's not a
competitive — deal," Ignatieff told reporters.
"We don't know whether we're getting value for money. And they're
releasing it on a Friday … in the middle of July, when they think no
Canadian is watching and when Parliament is not sitting."
A previous Liberal government signed a memorandum of understanding
with Lockheed Martin to develop the Joint Strike Fighter but that
did not commit Canada to buy the aircraft.
"I am questioning the hypocrisy which seems to soar higher than this
aircraft in now criticizing purchasing the very plane that the
previous government signalled very early on that they were going to
do," MacKay said.
Jets 'absolutely necessary': analyst
Military analyst Mercedes Stephenson told CBC News that the purchase
is "absolutely necessary."
She added: "We have to have fighter jets. Canada is a massive
country, and when you think purely about response times, there is
nothing else that can get across the country as fast as a fighter
"Also, when you are dealing with the Arctic, there is very little
that has the kind of survivability of a fighter jet in the air under
those kinds of harsh conditions."
She added that the purchase is also important for Canada to meet
obligations to its international allies.
"Everybody else is updating their fighter jets, and there simply
hasn't been a technology developed that can replace it at this
point," Stephenson said.
But the NDP argues even if Canada needs fighter jets, it's not clear
it needs these particular ones.
"The issue for the Canadian defence department is, is the F-35 what
we want?" said NDP MP Malcolm Allen.
Allen said the jet was built to suit the needs of U.S. forces.
"We are basically buying these for Canadian duties," he said. "New
Democrats are fully supportive of the men and women in the armed
forces ... but we have to decide what it is they are going to do,
and we have not done that."
Allen said that a proper analysis of Canada's defence needs has not
been done in 15 years
Stephen Harpers Assault on Democracy
The Council of Canadians Acting for Social Justice
Stephen Harper’s Assault on Democracy Author and
Murray Dobbin details the harm Prime Minister Stephen Harper is
doing to the political and social fabric of Canada in a new,
hard-hitting essay commissioned by the Council of Canadians titled
Harper’s Hitlist: Power, Process and the Assault on Democracy.
As Dobbin explains in the opening paragraphs of the essay, “This
study is intended to examine the most serious violations of
democracy committed by the prime minister and his government. Some
are clearly more serious than others. But taken as a whole they add
up to a dangerous undermining of our democratic traditions,
institutions and precedents – and politics. These violations are not
accidental, they are not incidental, and they are not oversights or
simply the sign of an impatient government or ‘decisive’ leadership.
They are a fundamental part of Harper’s iron-fisted determination to
remake Canada, whether Canadians like it or not.”
Harper’s Hitlist: Power, Process and the Assault on Democracy
here 1 MB or in sections below:
•Part 1 -
Stephen Harper’s Assault on Democracy
•Part 2 -
Two Prorogations in Less Than a Year
•Part 3 -
•Part 4 -
•Part 5 -
Manipulating and Muzzling the Media
•Part 6 -
A Personal Agenda
•Part 7 -
Failing to Protect Canadian Citizens
•Part 8 -
Harper Attacks Rights
•Part 9 -
Political Advocacy Under Fire
•Part 10 -
POLL: Environics, on behalf of the Council of Canadians, polled
people about their feelings about proportional representation in
February. Here are the results:
•61% of Canadians support moving to a system of proportional
representation in Parliament
•36% said they were more supportive of proportional representation
as a result of Prime Minister Harper’s recent prorogations
(These results represent the findings of a telephone survey
conducted among a
national random sample of 1,001 adults comprising 501 males and 500
years of age and older, living in Canada. The margin of error for a
sample of this size is +/- 3.10%, 19 times out of 20.)
New hard-hitting report details Prime Minister’s ‘assault on
Democracy’, April 15, 2010
About the Author
Murray Dobbin has been a freelance journalist, broadcaster and
author for thirty-five years. He is also a leading activist and
analyst in the movement against corporate globalization. He has
written extensively on various trade agreements and their impact on
democracy and on neo-liberalism’s attack on social programs. He is a
past executive board member of the Council of Canadians and author
or Word Warriors, and online activism tool hosted on the Council’s
One day a florist goes to a barber for a haircut.
After the cut he asked about his bill, and the barber replies, 'I
cannot accept money from you. I'm doing community service this
week.' The florist was pleased, and left the shop. When the barber
goes to open his shop the next morning, there is a 'thank you' card,
and a dozen roses waiting for him at his door.
Later, a cop comes in for a haircut, and when he tries to pay his
bill, the barber again replies, 'I cannot accept money from you. I'm
doing community service this week.' The cop is happy and leaves the
shop. The next morning when the barber goes to open up there is a
'thank you' card, and a dozen donuts waiting for him at his door.
Later that day, a college professor comes in for a haircut, and when
he tries to pay his bill, the barber again replies, 'I cannot accept
money from you. I'm doing community service this week.' The
professor is very happy and leaves the shop. The next morning when
the barber opens his shop, there is a 'thank you' card, & a dozen
different books, such as 'How to Improve Your Business' & 'Becoming
Then, a Politician comes in for a haircut, and when he goes to pay
his bill the barber again replies, 'I cannot accept money from you.
I'm doing community service this week.' The MP is very happy and
leaves the shop. The next morning when the barber goes to open up,
there are a dozen Members of Parliament lined up waiting for a free
And that, my friends, illustrates the Fundamental difference between
the Citizens of our country and the Members of our Government.
Never doubt the ability of a small group of concerned
citizens to change the world. In fact, it is the only thing that ever has.
If you have comments, ideas, solutions, concerns or complaints regarding
any level of your local, B.C., or Canada government, please make a comment by filling out the form below and/or comment directly to the
Regional District of Central Okanagan
Government of B.C.
Government of Canada
If this form does not work please,
View comments here.
Gossip for All
Make a Comment
[ INDEX ALL ] [ Air Quality ] [ Agriculture ] [ Barking Bylaw ] [ BC Election 09 ] [ BC Gov ] [ BC Human Rights ] [ BC Hydro ] [ BC Laws ] [ BC Native Land Claim ] [ BC Rivers ] [ Boating ] [ Building Inspection ] [ Building Laws ] [ Building Laws RDCO ] [ Bullying ] [ Bylaw Enforcement ] [ Canada Post ] [ Canadian Gov. ] [ Carbon Tax ] [ Democracy ] [ Denied Delegates ] [ Dictatorship ] [ Dog Complaints ] [ Drugs ] [ EDC ] [ Food ] [ Garbage Law ] [ Gas Prices ] [ Global Warming ] [ Gov. Spending ] [ Great Ideas ] [ Health Care ] [ Homelessness ] [ ICBC ] [ Inland Port ] [ Legal System ] [ Library ] [ Missing Pets ] [ New Government ] [ Petition to Parl. ] [ Planning ] [ RDCO Agreement ] [ RDCO Policy ] [ RDCO Policy Manual ] [ RDCO Spending ] [ Road Rage ] [ Robin Hood ] [ School Tax ] [ Security ] [ Smoking ] [ Sewer ] [ Suicide ] [ Tasers ] [ Telus Cell ] [ Telus TV ] [ Telus Wireless ] [ Tourism ] [ Tussock Moth ] [ Wage Inequality ] [ Water Board ] [ Western Budworm ] [ Westside T. Station ] [ WFN ] [ Wind Power ] [ Wrong ]
Gossip for All
Read others Comments
[ Air Quality ] [ Agriculture ] [ Barking Bylaw ] [ BC Election 09 ] [ BC Gov. ] [ BC Human Rights ] [ BC Hydro ] [ BC Laws ] [ BC Native Land Claim ] [ BC Rivers ] [ Boating ] [ Building Inspection ] [ Buidling Laws ] [ Building Laws RDCO ] [ Bullying ] [ Bylaw Enforcement ] [ Canada Post ] [ Canadian Gov. ] [ Carbon Tax ] [ Democracy ] [ Denied Delegates ] [ Dictatorship ] [ Dog Complaints ] [ Drugs ] [ EDC ] [ Food ] [ Garbage Laws ] [ Gas Prices ] [ Global Warming ] [ Gov. Spending ] [ Great Ideas ] [ Health Care ] [ Homelessness ] [ ICBC ] [ Inland Port ] [ Legal System ] [ Missing Pets ] [ New Government ] [ Petition to Parl. ] [ Planning Minutes ] [ RDCO Agreement ] [ RDCO Policy ] [ RDCO Policy Manual ] [ Road Rage ] [ RDCO Spending ] [ Robin Hood ] [ School Tax ] [ Secure Prosperity ] [ Sewer ] [ Smoking ] [ Suicide ] [ Tasers ] [ Telus Cell ] [ Telus TV ] [ Telus Wireless ] [ Tourism ] [ Tussock Moth ] [ Wage Inequality ] [ Water Board ] [ Western Budworm ] [ Westside T. Station ] [ WFN ] [ Wind Power ] [ Wrong ]
In Other Towns
[ INDEX ALL ] [ Boucherie Rd ] [ Kaleden ] [ Kelowna ] [ Naramata ] [ Oyama ] [ Peachland ] [ Penticton ] [ Summerland ] [ Vernon ] [ West Kelowna ] [ Westside Road ] [ Winfield ]
[ Boucherie Road ] [ Kaleden ] [ Kelowna ] [ Naramata ] [ Oyama ] [ Peachland ] [ Pentiction ] [ Summerland ] [ Vernon ] [ West Kelowna ] [ Westside Road ] [ Winfield ]
On okanaganlakebc.ca you will find
local Okanagan BC businesses, services, classifieds, local arts and crafts,
lakefront vacation rentals, plus much more
located near and around Okanagan Lake. We will be adding to this site, so come back and
check it often.