COW ELECTION 2011
LIVE CAM HWY 97 @ WESTSIDE RD
CHBC TV News
Joe Rich Community
Kelowna Capital News
Kelowna Daily Courier
Vernon Morning Star
Interior Highway Cams
Regional District of
Regional District of Okanagan
District of Lake Country
City of Penticton
District of Summerland
City of Vernon
District of West
Kelowna's Best Rock
RDCO Meeting Schedule
RDCO Board Reports
RDCO Board Agenda
RDCO Board Minutes
Gov Service Agenda
Gov Service Minutes
Westside Rd. Maps
North Westside Youth
Westside Rd Interchange
Westside Rd COMPLAINT FORM
Jobs in Vernon
Jobs in Kelowna
Food Action Society
BCGov FOI form
BC Forest Fire Info
BC Wildfires of Note
Kelowna RCMP Scanner
Yacht Club Wid Direction/Speed
Follow okanaganlakebc.ca on Twitter
OKANAGAN LAKE BC
LOCAL COMMUNITY CONTACT INFO
FOR ALL AREA'S
JUST IN THE FOLLOWING COMMUNITIES:
Mayes defends stance
Vernon Morning Star - February 27, 2011
I would like to take the opportunity to respond to Cliff Krueger's
Jan. 26, 2011 letter to the editor expressing his opinion on Private
Members Bill C-428 brought forward by Liberal MP, Ruby Dhalla. His
opinion focusses on what he feels to be my lack of knowledge
regarding residency requirements of OAS. As the Okanagan-Shuswap
federal representative, I take great strides to ensure that I
communicate accurate, updated information to constituents.
Presently, in order to qualify for OAS, there is a 10-year residency
after age 18. If this is met, eligible Canadians can start receiving
benefits at age 65. The calculation for this eligible benefit is
based on contributions and employment duration once this residency
requirement is met. To clarify for your information, the residency
requirement is what Ms. Dhalla is trying to change, irrelevant
ofemployment duration in Canada. This residency requirement is not
based on a person's permanent resident date but rather their record
of landing date as reflected in landing documents.Permanent
residence in Canada establishes your legal status but does not
establish residency requirement for OAS. Both requirements must be
met in order to qualify for OAS benefits.
I would also like to clarify for you that it is indeed possible for
a person to come to Canada and work while they are waiting for their
permanent resident card and it quite frankly happens a lot.
Immigrants to Canada can apply for a work permit to work for an
employer in Canada while simultaneously applying for permanent
residence if that is their choice. Thisemployment is considered in
the pension calculation from the time of the person's landing, not
from the time they receive permanent residence status.
In my view, the 10-year requirement period strikes an appropriate
balance between an individual's contribution to Canadian society and
the economy and his or her access to a life-long, publicly funded
benefit. It is reasonable to expect that a person live in Canada for
a minimum period of time before being granted the right to a
life-long public benefit.
The government is taking a fair and responsible approach to
providing benefits to seniors. There are currently 50 social
security agreements in place with a wide variety of countries. These
allow period of residence and contributions in the other country to
be used to meet the 10-year requirement. We continue to work hard to
sign more agreements in the future.
I am not in favour of this proposed legislation as it would be
costly — over $700 million — as well as irresponsible.
Colin Mayes, MP
Gov’t takes family income when breadwinner becomes ill
Kelowna Capital News - July 09, 2010
To the editor:
Our greedy provincial government is robbing from families who depend
on income from loved ones who have been the primary wage earners and
are now in care facilities.
The B.C. government has changed the rules for care costs in this
province. They now are saying that they are entitled to 80 per cent
of this income and families are being left to survive on what is
This hits women particularly hard who have relied upon their
husband’s income throughout their marriages. If it were me in the
nursing home, my husband would still be able to live on his entire
retirement pension as well as the 20 per cent left from my income.
How fair and just is this?
My husband and I are “baby boomers” born in the ’40s—our generation
believed that the wife was the gatherer and the husband, the hunter.
The husband earned the living and the wife stayed home, had children
and took care of the household. It wasn’t until women’s lib that we
women started to wise up, got our own degrees, took jobs and taught
our daughters to create their own careers to end the cycle of
dependency on our husbands for our livelihood. No more “barefoot,
pregnant and in the kitchen.”
I supported my husband while he was in university, as well as had
children and worked part time babysitting to make ends meet.
Fast forward to today, 2010, and our lives.
My husband, who worked hard at building a career, suddenly was
diagnosed with fron to temporal dementia at the ripe old age of 57.
His career ended.
I quit my job to take care of him, and within three years he was
admitted into a nursing home.
I have depended upon my husband’s income for my livelihood for the
past 42 years. My earnings over my lifetime add up to peanuts when
it comes to my Canada Pension and Old Age Security contributions, as
babysitting, being a “stay-at-home” mom, and a low-paid secretary
are not of much value where pensions are concerned.
I am 64 years old and doubt that too many people would hire me at
this stage of the game.
How can the government policy makers come up with such draconian
measures to facilitate families by taking the only income they have
to live on?
More and more people will be entering facilities and at a younger
age than our parents. There are no benefits for those who become ill
before the age of 65. The public is not aware of this situation and
will not understand until the bullet hits them.
Wake up people—you could be next. The government must change it’s
Lake Country receives study grant
Castanet.net by Contributed - Story: 53825 - Apr
The District of Lake Country has received a grant of almost $20,000
from the Union of British Columbia Municipalities to study and plan
for age friendly communities.
The Age friendly Community Projects and Planning grant program is
funded through the Seniors Housing and Support Initiative in
partnership with the provincial government.
grant of $19,997 will be used to study housing and social
participation of seniors within the community to develop age
friendly social and physical design guidelines and explore zoning
revisions to promote living communities.
The study will be undertaken by the District with the assistance of
BLUEGREEN Living Communities Inc., a local company that promotes
living communities that are supportive and sustainable.
"I am very excited that with this funding the District will be able
to explore improvements that can be made to provide housing and
amenities for all members of our community, regardless of age or
ability," says Mayor James Baker,
"This study also builds on our draft Official Community Plan's
commitment to age friendly and living communities."
The study will be undertaken over the next 12 months and engage
seniors, various District and community committees and
organizations, as well as other members of the community.
The final report will be presented to Council for consideration.
(You need to allow pop-ups for the following links to work)
Okanagan Info Net Directory
Found Locally .com
|Don't flush your expired pills down the toilet or in the garbage as
eventually it makes its way into water that we all drink.
will take your old expired pharmaceutical drugs and vitamins for
The drugs are sent to Vancouver for safe incineration. The program is
run by the non-profit Post-Consumer Pharmaceutical Stewardship
Association. Patients and pharmacies are not charged for returning
You will find
everything regarding Okanagan seniors here. We will be adding to this
site constantly, so come back and check it often.